tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1814874240228543789.post1753310990398426695..comments2024-03-28T00:19:17.790-07:00Comments on Agile Adoption Roadmap: The Chicken (CM) or the Egg (Agile)…Mario Moreirahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00969447879025623968noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1814874240228543789.post-44246758901087926402009-11-16T03:59:12.946-08:002009-11-16T03:59:12.946-08:00It is true that Agile tools followed Agile process...It is true that Agile tools followed Agile processes. However per configuration management (CM) did you know that CM (e.g., version control, build mgt, etc) has been around for at least 4 decades? The question is did Agile practices around CM come first that drove a change in CM or were those practices there around already (e.g, build on demand, continuous build, etc.).Mario Moreirahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00969447879025623968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1814874240228543789.post-13159292418534014562009-11-16T03:04:32.348-08:002009-11-16T03:04:32.348-08:00Agile processes came in movement of the late 1990s...Agile processes came in movement of the late 1990s. In 2007, Agile project management tools vendors were busy producing new. So we can say that Agile came first and configuration management second.<a href="http://www.sunrisesoftware.co.uk/main/about_us.php" rel="nofollow">configuration management</a>markinsonmarshalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06904483412295156652noreply@blogger.com